Traduction de «commission d'observation pour la paix » (Français → Anglais) :

7. Asks the newly-elected President to maintain his campaign promises and to use available resources to end the violence of Boko Haram, re-establishing stability and security over the whole country; reiterates, in this context, that a military approach alone will not suffice to counter the Boko Haram insurgency, but deems that regional peace and security will only be achieved through a multi-dimensional approach that addresses legitimate grievances, past and current human rights violations and root causes of the conflict;

(5a) In the interest of transparency, democracy and efficient implementation of Regulation (EC) No 428/2009, this Regulation should provide for a mechanism that gives stakeholders such as human rights and peace monitoring organisations and trade unions a say in the decision making process that leads to the updating of the countries of destination as well as the updating of goods identified as dual use items.

Finally, we demand the maximum degree of transparency to ensure that the regulation provides a mechanism which informs stakeholders, such as human rights or peace monitoring and trade unions organisations, of the various stages that made up the decision-making process, including through a report to the European Parliament

9. Recalls the important EU engagement in stopping the hostilities and in negotiating the ceasefire agreements during the 2008 conflict in Georgia and considers in this regard that the EU has a role to play, together with the OSCE, in preventing and mitigating inter-ethnic conflicts and tensions in the OSCE area; underlines that these conflicts are not only of considerable local and regional relevance but also have a direct impact on EU security architecture; calls for a new agreement to revive an OSCE peace monitoring mission in Georgia in order to prevent further violence, protect minorities and promote negotiations, ensuring securit ...[+++]y and stability in the South Caucasus region;

The Commission observes that, by their plea, the appellants are essentially asking the Court to change the case-law deriving from the judgment in AM S Europe v Commission

20. Notes that, with regard to recruitment, the Agency does not accept the ECA's criticism that it did not respect the principle of equal treatment as the minimum years of professional experience required for a given position differed from those agreed between the Commission and the agencies; notes that the Agency considers its practice to be in line with the rules, as it had to attract highly specialised staff under difficult conditions; observes that the Staff Regulations stipulate that Community agencies have to adopt their gener ...[+++]al implementing provisions (GIP) in agreement with the Commission; notes that the Commission has drafted model decisions for the GIP; notes that the Commission has not yet agreed to the draft GIP submitted by the Agency; calls on the Agency, in agreement with the Council recommendation, to strictly respect the recruitment criteria in the Staff Regulations in order to ensure equal treatment with regard to the years of professional experience required for a given post;